PART 1:
I feel that i was fairly successful in incorporating the hyper-realism style; however, it wasn't perfect. The eyes of the frog looked realistic, but the bumps on the frog's stomach/body need work.
Imitation is simply copying something without making it your own, while inspiration is when the artist uses his/her source as a source of reference.
PART 2:
PART 3:
Research the following and evaluate whether or not the piece is considered "art" based on your criteria:
1. "1000 hours of staring by Tom Friedman
I don't consider this as respectable art, since it doesn't look like it took effort, time, or any thinking.
2. Sistine Chapel ceiling by Michelangelo
I believe this is definitely a masterpiece of art. After seeing this in person, I can say that is definitely an awe-inspiring work of art. If this isn't art, nothing is.
3. The Bowery in Two Inadequate Descriptive Systems by Martha Rosler
Being a person with a great appreciation for art, I consider Martha's work as good art. It isn't the most time consuming, but it succeeds in conveying emotions or feelings.
4. Jackson Pollock #8
I don't consider this as art, since it doesn't evoke any feeling or memory. It also doesn't look too difficult to create. I'm sure it took time and a bit of technique but it just doesn't strike me as great art.
5. Sol le Witt's wall drawings
No comments:
Post a Comment